Friday, March 1, 2013

Federal regulators and revolving door

From: RDShatt@aol.com
To: roy.snell@corporatecompliance.org, paul.mcnulty@bakermckenzie.com, jemurphy@voicenet.com, patrick.gnazzo@gmail.com, corporate.ethics@lmco.com, mdoyle@aegis-compliance.com
CC: ebloxham@thevaluealliance.com
Sent: 2/27/2013 5:57:09 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Food for thought: The Bloxham Voice
To Government Compliance Conference speakers:
In follow up to my recent emails to you, I call to your attention the February 18th post SEC and Citi: Justice for Sale in Eleanor Bloxham's blog, The Bloxham Voice.
The post registers the public's growing complaint about the lack of individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing and suggests that the regulators themselves may be part of the problem by reason of the revolving door between regulating agencies and the regulated companies, and regulators not being as aggressive as they should be in order to curry favor with corporate management the regulators may seek future employment from.
I hope Ms. Bloxham's blog post provides further impetus for the speakers to think about what I said in my emails.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck

From: RDShatt@aol.com
To: jmcpherson@naag.org
Sent: 3/1/2013 7:28:29 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Federal regulators and revolving door
Dear Jim,
NAAG might want to ponder this February 18th post SEC and Citi: Justice for Sale in Eleanor Bloxham's blog, The Bloxham Voice.
The post registers the public's growing complaint about the lack of individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing and suggests that the SEC regulators themselves may be part of the problem by reason of the revolving door between regulating agencies and the regulated companies, and regulators not being as aggressive as they should be in order to curry favor with corporate management from whom the regulators may seek future employment.
Ms. Bloxham's blog post suggests a case for state attorneys general to make that they are to be more trusted by the public for deterring corporate wrongdoing.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck

From: RDShatt@aol.com
To: ri@nasaa.org
Sent: 3/1/2013 7:39:53 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: SEC and revolving door
Dear Mr. Iuculana,
I am writing this in follow up to a couple of emails I sent previously.
NASAA might want to ponder this February 18th post SEC and Citi: Justice for Sale in Eleanor Bloxham's blog, The Bloxham Voice.
The post registers the public's growing complaint about the lack of individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing and suggests that the SEC regulators themselves may be part of the problem by reason of the revolving door between regulating agencies and the regulated companies, and regulators not being as aggressive as they should be in order to curry favor with corporate management from whom the regulators may seek future employment.
Ms. Bloxham's blog post suggests a case for state securities regulators to make that they are to be more trusted by the public for deterring corporate wrongdoing.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck

From: RDShatt@aol.com
To: chris.rhodes@asc.alabama.gov
CC: asc@asc.alabama.gov
Sent: 3/1/2013 7:46:16 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: SEC and revolving door
Dear Mr. Rhodes,
I am writing this in follow up to a couple of emails I sent previously addressed to the Commission and you.
The Commission might want to ponder this February 18th post SEC and Citi: Justice for Sale in Eleanor Bloxham's blog, The Bloxham Voice.
The post registers the public's growing complaint about the lack of individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing and suggests that the SEC regulators themselves may be part of the problem by reason of the revolving door between regulating agencies and the regulated companies, and regulators not being as aggressive as they should be in order to curry favor with corporate management from whom the regulators may seek future employment.
Ms. Bloxham's blog post suggests a case for state securities regulators to make that they are to be more trusted by the public for deterring corporate wrongdoing.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
Birmingham

[online message submitted to Alabama AG]
Dear Mr. Strange,
I am writing this online message in follow up to an online message I sent to you last October.
As Attorney General, you might want to ponder this February 18th post "SEC and Citi: Justice for Sale" (URL http://robertshattuck.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-bloxham-voice.html) in Eleanor Bloxham's blog, The Bloxham Voice.
The post registers the public's growing complaint about the lack of individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing and suggests that the SEC regulators themselves may be part of the problem by reason of the revolving door between regulating agencies and the regulated companies, and regulators not being as aggressive as they should be in order to curry favor with corporate management from whom the regulators may seek future employment.
Ms. Bloxham's blog post suggests a case for state attorneys general to make that they are to be more trusted by the public for deterring corporate wrongdoing.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rob Shattuck
Mountain Brook

No comments: